Summary and evaluation writing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Summary and evaluation writing - Essay Example Although, he admits that one may unintentionally omit some drawing aspects, he emphasizes on the essence of the incorporation of standard symbols and features when representing a source or a specific target. Goldschmidt ecucidates on how creative sketching can moderate the problem space by showing the representation behavior depicted in the sketches. While drawing has undergone evolution over the years with improvement of paper, Goldschmidt argues that it is recemmended for skilled sketchers to integrate orthogonal projections in their skecthes for complete representaion. Though a number of researcher suggest the benefits of imagery over sketches, Goldschmidt strongly disapproves this allegation. Concerning the beneficial aspect of skething on sharpening one’s creative imagination and reflective skills, I wholly support Goldschmidt. Though not every person or child may possess good skething skills or simply the passion as every individual has their innate capabilities. His ack nowlededgement of the fact that skething in a child improves over time to a detailed level is largely accurate as regular practice in sketching advances over time. However, I do not subscibe to the idea that emphasizes on the necessity of incorporating orthogonal projection as I strongly believe that each artist has their own way of enhancing their sketches. This takes me to the point that sketching is a liberated field and so every sketcher should do their own style. Lastly, I concur with Goldschmidt in emphasizing that sketches speak volumes as compared to imagery and they are easier to interpret. Although th use of imagery is crucial in creative writing, it is best suited for longer works besides involving some element of reading skills. Schon, D. 1983, ‘Design as a reflective conversation with the situation’, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York, pp. 76-104. Schon complains about the little attention that architecture has received over the years especially considering the fact that most design professions derive their foundation from architecture as field. He goes ahead to affirm how design can manifest as a reflective conversation more so in difficult and complex circumstances and situations. Schon categorically mentions in his article the close relationship between verbal and non-verbal communication, clearly depicting the essence of design as an architectural tool in eliminating language barrier. In reflecting the design aspects, Schon agrees that the shape plays an important role in architectural design as it forms silent reflective conversations with the subjects. Besides, he states the role of different shapes in as far as enhancing space is concerned. Schon claims that there are three dimensions attached to architectural design namely the consequences of the design sphere, the implications of the discovery, and the ability to respond to the situation. Schon argues that architectural desig n is crucial in solving problems of geometrical nature through critical and analytical reflection of the elements of design domain. I agree with Schon’s claim that architecture as the mother of all designs does not get the deserved acknowledgement in as far as

DB-5 Intellectual Property Law Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

DB-5 Intellectual Property Law - Research Paper Example However, it does not affect the validity of the patent acquired by Omni Chemical Co. in State Y because â€Å"patents are specific to particular jurisdictions† (Patent Lens, n.d). Since Bumpkin had published his discovery without patenting it, any person or business was free to use this discovery or any of its contents without prior permission. The Green Chemical Ltd. may argue that this discovery had been made available worldwide and hence it could be considered as general information. However, the case scenario specifically states that the journals which published the discovery of Bumpkin in State Y had never been checked or used by anyone prior to 1992. In that situation, the Omni Chemical Co. attained a patent in 1988 for their production formula, which included this discovery in State Y and hence no other individual or business in this State has the right to use this compound. The argument that Nitrophos has not been separately patented in State Y is not valid as this information is a part of the Omni Chemical’s production formula. Intellectual property right laws clearly define various rights of a patentee. Patent right â€Å"is an exclusive lic ense or right granted to a company or an individual to produce a particular product or use a particular technology on the basis of its claim to be the discoverer of the product or technology.† (Nayar, 2010, p.143). Referring to this definition, it is clear that the Omni Chemical Co. has obtained a license over its fertilizer from the State Y Patent Office and hence the company has the sole right to manufacture and distribute the product across state Y. Such a license would serve Omni Chemical Co. as a tool to prevent unauthorized reproduction and distribution of the patented product. Patent laws do not allow third parties to use any content of the patented property and therefore the Omni Chemical Co. has complete right over its fertilizer called Fast Grow39. The fact that Omni Chemical Co. is a